Author Archives: Staff Reporter

Psychic’s grave undertaking

Roy Stemman and Ian LawtonNo tears were shed when Ian Lawman, a British TV psychic and exorcist, was laid to rest on a windswept hill in the West Midlands today. I was among those who attended his interment, which turned out to be a fun event for all involved, including Ian. In fact, he happily posed for photographs before his burial (that’s me, with him, left, an hour before he climbed into the coffin).

As you will have guessed by now, Ian – whose TV appearances have included Most Haunted, I’m Famous and Frightened, and Fit and Fearless – was not dead when they buried him. And he doesn’t plan to be dead when they dig him up again in seven days’ time.

So why has the self-styled “bad boy of the psychic world” decided to subject himself to the ordeal of being entombed in a coffin six feet underground, beneath two tonnes of soil? To raise £10,000 for The Blue Lamp Foundation, which was set up by PC David Rathband for injured emergency service workers after he was blinded when gunman Raoul Moat went on a rampage last year. Visitors who contributed to the charity were asked to sign the coffin lid (below right) before it was placed over Ian.

Signing the coffin lidThe buried-alive event took place in the ruins of Dudley Castle, which in parts is almost 1,000 years old and is regarded by some as one of the most haunted castles in England.

Ian’s burial coincided with a Fright Nights event at the castle, including a ghost tour, “vigils”, and other allegedly paranormal goings-on. I don’t have a very high opinion of such capers, nor of the psychic abilities of those involved, and nothing I saw at Dudley Castle has changed my mind.

But I won’t let that detract from my respect for someone who’s prepared to spend seven days below ground in a box in order to raise money for a good cause. If you want to give Ian’s feat of endurance your support and help him reach his target you can do so here.

UPDATE: 9 April: Well, he did it! Congratulations, Ian. After eight days in the coffin, during which time visitors were able to peer down at him while others from around the world could see him on a webcam link, Ian Lawman stepped out of his “prison” last night and into the welcoming arms of friends and well-wishers, looking remarkably fit and agile. You can see video clips of the start and finish of his endurance test here. He is hoping to raise £10,000. So far, the total donated is in excess of £2,370.

Ownership of ‘Psychic News’ assets has been decided

Seven months after I revealed that the Spiritualists’ National Union (SNU) was claiming to own the assets of Psychic News – the weekly Spiritualist newspaper it closed in July last year – I can now disclose that the Union has had to concede that the newspaper’s title, archives and other assets are not its possessions.

This revelation is contained in a statement that has just been posted on the News pages of the Spiritual Truth Foundation (STF), of which I am a trustee. The STF, as the previous owner of Psychic News, disputed the SNU’s claim and took legal advice which it presented to SNU representatives and the Joint Liquidators in January.

The Joint Liquidators have now approved this brief statement:

As a result of discussions between the parties involved and following legal advice, it has been determined that the disputed assets referred to in the November 17, 2010, joint statement belong to Psychic Press (1995) Ltd, now in liquidation.

Naturally, I will report on the outcome of the liquidation process, which is currently on-going, when it comes to a conclusion.

Regular visitors to this Blog will know that on 21 August 2010, in an article headed “Life, death and asset stripping?” which referred to talks that had taken place between the SNU and a potential buyer of Psychic News, the JV Trust, I wrote: “What is new to me is the declaration made by the SNU representatives during those discussions that ‘the newspaper’s title and its archives are assets of the SNU and always will be’.”

I concluded my Blog with these words:

“If Psychic Press (1995) Ltd goes into liquidation [which it subsequently did], the above mentioned items must be among the assets which the liquidator puts up for sale to the highest bidder. It is essential that what is sold by the liquidator raises as much as possible for the newspaper’s creditors.

“Needless to say, I and many others will be examining the events surrounding Psychic News’ demise and the actions of those involved very closely and challenging any attempt by the SNU to hijack assets that do not belong to it.”

Let us hope that, having established the ownership of those disputed assets, the Joint Liquidators can now bring matters to a swift conclusion, though breathing new life into a business that has been allowed to lie moribund for so long is not going to be easy if a new owner is found.

Since comment and speculation about the on-going liquidation is not likely to assist the outcome, I am not opening this Blog to comments. There will be ample opportunity to do that when I am able to announce completion of the liquidation process, what the company’s creditors will receive and what will happen to Psychic News in the future.

Ownership of Psychic News assets under review

I am pleased to report some progress in the ongoing saga of Psychic News‘ demise. At a meeting of creditors of Psychic Press (1995) Ltd, held in London on 15 November, Patricia Marsh and Clive Hammond of Marsh Hammond & Partners were appointed joint liquidators of the company that published the weekly Spiritualist newspaper. As a result of discussions that took place at that meeting, the following statement has been issued, under the heading “Asset realisations”:

The Spiritual Truth Foundation (STF) and the Spiritualists’ National Union (SNU) have agreed to discuss the identity and the ownership of the disputed assets with the Joint Liquidators and further updates will be provided in due course.”

Regular visitors to my blog will know that it is the STF’s contention, as the previous owner of Psychic News (PN), that the publication was given to the SNU in 1995 as a total package so that PN could continue to exist as an independent newspaper. It ceased publication earlier this year when the SNU declared it could not support its continued publication.

However, when an offer to purchase Psychic News was made, the SNU insisted that the publication’s title and other assets belonged to the union and were not on offer to potential buyers. No explanation has been offered as to why it would want to claim and retain these assets.

Naturally, I will keep you informed of developments, as and when they happen.

Clint gives us a peek at the ‘Hereafter’

Hereafter posterWhat happens when we die? That’s the question veteran actor and director Clint Eastwood sets out to answer in his latest movie, Hereafter. At the age of 80, it has been suggested that it must be something he asks himself most days. But that’s not as unkind as some of the movie critics have been about the film. Among the reviews I’ve read – Hereafter went on public release in the UK and Europe yesterday – one describes watching it as coming close to “a near-death experience”, another says “it’s a messily-structured, rambling film with stilted dialogue”, and a third dismisses it as “a baby-brained meditation on the afterlife”. I decided to make my own judgment.

I found myself in agreement with some of these critics, but I also felt that, in its own way, Hereafter is getting an important message across about our consciousness surviving the transition we call death to people whose minds might otherwise be closed to even considering it.

The movie’s main premise is simple: we live after we die – no ifs or buts, it’s as straightforward as that. It also tells us that in certain circumstances we may catch a glimpse of that other reality, such as during a near-death experience. And it even accepts that some individuals have the power to see and communicate with those who have passed on.

The really good thing about this storyline is that it is conveyed in totally non-religious terms. Clint Eastwood’s vision of the Hereafter, presumably, is one that is open to everyone, regardless of their beliefs.

But if the viewing public accepts everything they see on the silver screen as the truth about the paranormal – or start to analyse the movie more deeply – they’ll end up very confused. Here’s why:

Matt Damon plays a reluctant American psychic, George, who is so troubled by his talents (“It’s a curse, not a gift!” he says more than once) that he prefers to earn a living as a forklift driver. He appears to be devoid of psychic talent until he actually touches or is touched by a person. Worse still, the evidence of his mediumship consists of descriptions of dead people that are so vague as to be almost meaningless: no names, no astonishing revelations, just generalisations. Yet the sitter we see him giving a reading to says later: “He told me things no one else could have known”.

Hereafter is a three-strand story that eventually comes together at the end. The second element revolves around a TV presenter, Marie LeLay (Cécile De France), whose near-death experience (NDE) during the Indian Ocean tsunami changes her outlook on life. The tsunami itself is created so realistically that it has earned Hereafter an Academy Award nomination for best visual effects. But the vision of the afterlife which she has whilst being swept under water is as vague and shapeless as Matt Damon’s spirit communications. We see white, blurry figures but nothing that remotely matches what is usually reported.

The most unconvincing aspect of this particular strand of the story, which is in French with subtitles, is that the TV presenter takes a break from her job to write a biography of President Francois Mitterand, 10 years after his death. Her publishers are delighted until she delivers the first three chapters and they find she has written, instead, a book about dying and the afterlife. This eventually gets into print with a different publisher and is called, of course, Hereafter. Matt Damon is seen reading it (below) as the separate threads of the story begin to come together.

The final strand of the story unravels in London and involves twin boys, Marcus and Jason (played by real-life twins George and Frankie McLaren) whose mother is a drug addict. Jason is knocked down and killed by a vehicle whilst running away from thugs and Marcus begins a quest to find out if his twin still exists.

That quest leads him, bizarrely, to a Spiritualist meeting where he gets a message from a platform medium whose only talent is “cold reading” and she’s not very good at that, either. We also see him trying to contact Jason through a researcher with electronic voice phenomenon equipment. And, lastly, he bumps into psychic George, who he recognises from his Google research, and stalks him until he agrees to give him a reading in his hotel room.

Matt Damon with bookSuggesting that such a young and vulnerable boy could wander alone around psychic and Spiritualist meetings, and have private sittings with mediums, without it ringing alarm bells with those involved is, frankly, laughable.

It is, however, just a movie and by no means the most far-fetched that I have seen. Besides, when we are fed largely on a diet of vampires, sci-fi, sex romps or romantic comedy movies, it’s a refreshing change to watch a film that does its best to answer a question that everyone asks themselves at some time or another and few find a satisfactory answer.

Whether Clint Eastwood’s answer is one that many movie-goers are prepared to consider is, of course, a totally different matter.

The King’s Speech and Logue’s chair

Logue on Edward's chairThe King’s Speech is grabbing the headlines, with the nationwide release in the UK of the superb movie [click here to see trailer] about King George VI and his speech therapist Lionel Logue, about which I have already written in my recent Blog.

Ever since I first wrote about Logue and the stammering monarch in my book Spirit Communication I’ve wondered what happened to the wooden chair which Logue presented to Lilian Bailey, the London trance medium, in gratitude for the spirit messages she conveyed from his dead wife, Myrtle.
It was in this chair that George VI sat when he visited Logue’s consulting rooms at Harley Street. Lilian Bailey always used it for seances, and it was in Logue’s chair that she sat when I visited her for a sitting in the late 1960s. The chair in which Logue (Geoffrey Rush) is pictured here is not the chair I am talking about, I hasten to add, as it is meant to be King Edward’s Chair (also known as the Coronation Chair) in Westminster Abbey on which British monarchs are crowned.

Coinciding with the movie is a book of the same title, The King’s Speech, written by Mark Logue (Lionel’s grandson) and Peter Conradi. I contacted Mark to make him aware of my Blog and he responded saying, “This is interesting stuff, especially the chair. Do you know its whereabouts now?”

Colin Firth as George VIThe answer, I’m afraid, is that I don’t, but perhaps a reader of this Blog might help us shed light on where it is now.  My guess is that when Lilian Bailey died in October 1971 the chair passed to Gordon Adams, her son-in-law. In that case, it is likely that on his death the chair passed to one of his two sons, whose names, I believe, were Nicholas and Clive. I met them both when they were young but have lost touch with them, though I believe one became a clergyman.

If you know of Gordon Adams’ sons’ whereabouts, do let me know. Lionel Logue, incidentally, was their godfather. He agreed to take on that responsibility in gratitude for their grandmother’s mediumship, and participated in their naming ceremony, conducted by the spirit guide Silver Birch through the mediumship of Maurice Barbanell.

Mark Logue tells me that his grandfather “was not very effusive in his diary or correspondence about this aspect [Spiritualism] of his beliefs”. He continues to research Lionel Logue’s life and “should I be allowed to make changes in the paperback edition, it might be nice to include some of this information”.

In my previous Blog, I quoted extensively from Death Is Her Life by W.F. Neech, a rare book which Mark Logue knew existed but had not been able to obtain. Having just seen the latest, excellent edition of Spirit of PN, the online independent Spiritualist newspaper, produced by Sue Farrow, I am reminded that Maurice Barbanell also covered the story of Lionel Logue in his excellent book This Is Spiritualism.

His account contains additional information that is worth recording here. It tells us, for example, that according to Hannen Swaffer – the famous journalist who introduced Logue anonymously to Lillian Bailey – the speech therapist’s photograph had not been published in any newspapers, so Bailey would not have recognised him.

Logue’s wife Myrtle controlled the entranced medum at his second sitting with her, which also took place at Swaffer’s London flat but at which he was not present as he had to attend a Guildhall banquet. Myrtle also told her grieving husband he must not consider taking his life: that would divide them rather than bring about the reunion he longed for.

At a later sitting with Lilian Bailey, after Logue had moved from a large house into a flat, he asked his dead wife what had happened to the bed linen. She replied that she would like him to use the yellow sheets and pillowcases, describing the box in which he would find them. Barbanell also tells us:

“It was Logue who volunteered to [Lilian Bailey] that Spiritualism had enabled him to understand his work of correcting speech defects, which occupied the major part of his life. He realised, since he had received his séance proofs, that he had been guided to leave Australia, when there was no apparent reason, and to seek a new career in Britain. Without knowing why, at the time, he had sold up his home. There were no seeming prospects in England, and it appeared to be madness….

Logue, George VI, Queen Elizabeth“He told me that he made no secret of his Spiritualism. On several occasions he had described to King George VI his séances with Lillian Bailey, recounting the wonderful evidence he had received from his wife, and he had never met with hostility.”

Having now seen the movie, I am in no doubt that it will be a huge box office success and deserves awards for many of those involved, particularly actors Colin Firth (King George VI), Geoffrey Rush (Lionel Logue) and Helena Bonham Carter (Queen Elizabeth).

It’s a simple but moving account of an unlikely friendship between a man who was to become king and an unqualified therapist whose methods triumphed in helping his client overcome his speech impediment. The film, inevitably, fictionalises some events in this relationship for dramatic effect. For the full truth, I recommend the book based, in part, on Lionel Logue’s recently-discovered diaries: The King’s Speech by Mark Logue and Peter Conradi.