The King’s Speech and Logue’s chair

Logue on Edward's chairThe King’s Speech is grabbing the headlines, with the nationwide release in the UK of the superb movie [click here to see trailer] about King George VI and his speech therapist Lionel Logue, about which I have already written in my recent Blog.

Ever since I first wrote about Logue and the stammering monarch in my book Spirit Communication I’ve wondered what happened to the wooden chair which Logue presented to Lilian Bailey, the London trance medium, in gratitude for the spirit messages she conveyed from his dead wife, Myrtle.
It was in this chair that George VI sat when he visited Logue’s consulting rooms at Harley Street. Lilian Bailey always used it for seances, and it was in Logue’s chair that she sat when I visited her for a sitting in the late 1960s. The chair in which Logue (Geoffrey Rush) is pictured here is not the chair I am talking about, I hasten to add, as it is meant to be King Edward’s Chair (also known as the Coronation Chair) in Westminster Abbey on which British monarchs are crowned.

Coinciding with the movie is a book of the same title, The King’s Speech, written by Mark Logue (Lionel’s grandson) and Peter Conradi. I contacted Mark to make him aware of my Blog and he responded saying, “This is interesting stuff, especially the chair. Do you know its whereabouts now?”

Colin Firth as George VIThe answer, I’m afraid, is that I don’t, but perhaps a reader of this Blog might help us shed light on where it is now.  My guess is that when Lilian Bailey died in October 1971 the chair passed to Gordon Adams, her son-in-law. In that case, it is likely that on his death the chair passed to one of his two sons, whose names, I believe, were Nicholas and Clive. I met them both when they were young but have lost touch with them, though I believe one became a clergyman.

If you know of Gordon Adams’ sons’ whereabouts, do let me know. Lionel Logue, incidentally, was their godfather. He agreed to take on that responsibility in gratitude for their grandmother’s mediumship, and participated in their naming ceremony, conducted by the spirit guide Silver Birch through the mediumship of Maurice Barbanell.

Mark Logue tells me that his grandfather “was not very effusive in his diary or correspondence about this aspect [Spiritualism] of his beliefs”. He continues to research Lionel Logue’s life and “should I be allowed to make changes in the paperback edition, it might be nice to include some of this information”.

In my previous Blog, I quoted extensively from Death Is Her Life by W.F. Neech, a rare book which Mark Logue knew existed but had not been able to obtain. Having just seen the latest, excellent edition of Spirit of PN, the online independent Spiritualist newspaper, produced by Sue Farrow, I am reminded that Maurice Barbanell also covered the story of Lionel Logue in his excellent book This Is Spiritualism.

His account contains additional information that is worth recording here. It tells us, for example, that according to Hannen Swaffer – the famous journalist who introduced Logue anonymously to Lillian Bailey – the speech therapist’s photograph had not been published in any newspapers, so Bailey would not have recognised him.

Logue’s wife Myrtle controlled the entranced medum at his second sitting with her, which also took place at Swaffer’s London flat but at which he was not present as he had to attend a Guildhall banquet. Myrtle also told her grieving husband he must not consider taking his life: that would divide them rather than bring about the reunion he longed for.

At a later sitting with Lilian Bailey, after Logue had moved from a large house into a flat, he asked his dead wife what had happened to the bed linen. She replied that she would like him to use the yellow sheets and pillowcases, describing the box in which he would find them. Barbanell also tells us:

“It was Logue who volunteered to [Lilian Bailey] that Spiritualism had enabled him to understand his work of correcting speech defects, which occupied the major part of his life. He realised, since he had received his séance proofs, that he had been guided to leave Australia, when there was no apparent reason, and to seek a new career in Britain. Without knowing why, at the time, he had sold up his home. There were no seeming prospects in England, and it appeared to be madness….

Logue, George VI, Queen Elizabeth“He told me that he made no secret of his Spiritualism. On several occasions he had described to King George VI his séances with Lillian Bailey, recounting the wonderful evidence he had received from his wife, and he had never met with hostility.”

Having now seen the movie, I am in no doubt that it will be a huge box office success and deserves awards for many of those involved, particularly actors Colin Firth (King George VI), Geoffrey Rush (Lionel Logue) and Helena Bonham Carter (Queen Elizabeth).

It’s a simple but moving account of an unlikely friendship between a man who was to become king and an unqualified therapist whose methods triumphed in helping his client overcome his speech impediment. The film, inevitably, fictionalises some events in this relationship for dramatic effect. For the full truth, I recommend the book based, in part, on Lionel Logue’s recently-discovered diaries: The King’s Speech by Mark Logue and Peter Conradi.

Priest returns as son of woman he loved?

Hernani Guimaräes AndradeImagine browsing through a friend’s library of books on psychical research and coming across a volume whose cover featured a voluptuous female, cloaked in purple, with one shoulder tantalisingly exposed and a hand resting lightly on a pregnant bulge. One’s reaction might well be that this is a Mills & Boon romantic novel that belongs in a different collection and to slip it quickly back on the shelf. Even a surreptitious delve between its covers would do little to dispel that initial conclusion. We should not judge a book by its cover, of course, but in the case of Reborn For Love, which tells the story of an unusual case of apparent reincarnation in Brazil, it is not only the cover’s artwork which sends out confusing signals.

Hernani Guimaräes Andrade (right) – who was President of the Brazilian Institute for Psychobiophysical Research at the time he produced this work, and in whose Proceedings it was first published in 1995 – is clearly identified as the author, yet over half of its pages are not written by him: they were penned by one of the subjects, referred to throughout by variations of the pseudonym “(Mrs) Dona Marine Waterloo”.

And since she is an educated Brazilian woman with a flair for writing, the account reads very much like fiction at times, particularly her extensive use of quoted childhood conversations which are clearly constructed from memory rather than having been recorded verbatim.
Fortunately, the accuracy of these quotations is not important: their purpose is to capture the essence of an unusual love story between a young girl and a much older priest, whose identity is also hidden behind a pseudonym, “Father Jonathan”.

He taught at her school, where many of the girls regarded him as ugly. Most readers will struggle to understand the attraction between the two —a strange, chaste and almost unspoken ‘affair’ which ended when Father Jonathan was moved to another post. They lost touch apart from an occasional letter and Dona Marine gave little thought to him as she became an adult, married and started a family. It was her husband who drew her attention to a radio news item one day which reported that Father Jonathan had been killed in a road accident.

Guy Lyon Playfair
Guy Lyon Playfair, the book’s editor, and a portrait of Allan Kardec, whose research inspires Spiritist teachings.

It is at this point that Andrade’s book begins to live up to its promise, which is to provide compelling evidence for reincarnation. (Guy Lyon Playfair, who edited and revised this English edition of Renasceau por Amor, says he has “seldom come across such a persuasive case in any area of psychical research”.)

What transformed a schoolgirl’s crush into a case worthy of parapsychological investigation was a series of paranormal events in the Waterloo household, immediately following Father Jonathan’s passing on 30 May, 1972, and then statements made by her young son, “Kilden”, who was born more than seven years after the priest’s death.

As a Roman Catholic, Dona Marine gave no thought to the possibility that Kilden could be the reincarnation of the priest when he was born, but she was forced consider that possibility when her young son began making statements about how he had died in a previous life. He also insisted on being called Alexandre (his second name) which was also (confusingly!) Father Jonathan’s name. When his mother began to consider that her son might be the priest reborn she wrote to Father Jonathan’s sister, who confirmed the details given by Kilden about how he had died. Kilden even identified “himself” and others in old photographs and gave other details about Father Jonathan’s life that were confirmed by those who knew him but were unknown to Dona Marine.

Having allowed the main subject to tell her story, Andrade – several of whose 21 published papers and books are on rebirth, including    Reencarnagäo no Brasil—explains how the case was brought to his attention by Luiz Antonio Brasil and how they set about investigating it.

One of Brazil’s most respected psychical researchers, Andrade regarded this as a very strong reincarnation case and when he takes over the narrative from the subject, discussing and dismissing alternative explanations, the book begins to have far greater appeal for a parapsychological readership. It does, however, become repetitive, as he quotes again large chunks of the subject’s literary testimony. Some of Andrade’s statements about the modus operandi of reincarnation will also be a step too far for most other researchers, however open-minded.

His views reflect, one suspects, the Spiritist philosophy, based on the teachings of Allan Kardec, with which Andrade would have been very familiar. For example, he assures us that six years is the average “intermission” period between one life and the next in children who appear to recall a past life, whereas “for normal people who do not remember past lives, the intermission time is approximately 250 years” – a finding he credits to Karl W. Goldstein.

Andrade suggests that his own Biological Organising Model (BOM), which offers an explanation of how a discarnate spirit interacts with the ovum at an early stage in the reincarnation process, could also be used to explain the appearance of connected paranormal phenomena occurring in advance of that rebirth.

Donna Marine Waterloo’s detailed story is a useful reminder that, although books such as this need to be evidence-based to satisfy a scientific readership, the events they describe usually happen to ordinary people and have a huge impact on them, transcending the cold facts and even transforming their lives.

Reborn For Love sets out to demonstrate the existence of a soul which not only survives death but also is able to incarnate again, and to show that love can be a major factor in determining where that rebirth occurs. It may not satisfy everyone in that respect but it is clearly an important piece of a very complex jigsaw puzzle.

This review by Roy Stemman of Reborn For Love by Hernani Guimaräes Andrade (Roundtable Publishing, London, 2010. 174 pp. £10) was first published in the Journal of the Society for Psychical Research [Vol 74.4, No 901] in October 2010.

 

Spiritualism’s elder statesman tells all

Eric Hatton with biographyEarlier today I was honoured to participate in the launch of Taking Up The Challenge, the biography of one of Spiritualism’s elder statesmen, 84-year-old Eric Hatton, whom I have always held in the highest esteem. Working with Susan Farrow, the former editor of Psychic News, Eric has at last found time in his busy life to record his Spiritualist experiences and share them with others. I was delighted to be asked to write a foreword to the book and was equally pleased to be invited to speak briefly to those who had congregated at Stourbridge Spiritualist Church, where Eric has been president for many years, for this morning’s book launch. Those of us who have had the opportunity to discuss his experiences with him over the years will know that Eric has been privileged to have sat with the finest mediums, witnessing some astonishing paranormal phenomena in the process.

So it was hardly surprising that well over 100 books were sold in less than an hour and their purchasers queued for Eric to sign them at the launch party. Many, of course, were members of the very active West Midlands Spiritualist church, to which Eric and his wife Heather, who passed in 2007, dedicated so much of their lives. Those attending the event were eager to learn more about the man and his experiences, and Taking Up The Challenge will certainly live up to their expectations.

After all, it is virtually a Who’s Who? of modern Spiritualism. Any UK medium who achieved prominence in the past half-century or more was certainly known to Eric and his book provides fascinating insights into the way they worked and the evidence they provided.

It is, of course, his personal experiences of spirit communication and healing provided by some of Spiritualism’s best known exponents which makes this a must-read book.

Eric Hatton signing booksNotable among these is his account of a séance which he and Heather attended – before they married – with Welsh physical medium Alec Harris. The couple witnessed materialised spirit forms walking out of the curtained “cabinet” in which the entranced Harris was seated and being greeted by their loved ones who not only recognised them but conversed with them.

The finale was extraordinary. A figure in Middle Eastern attire, another dressed as a Red Indian and a third – a small girl who had appeared earlier in the séance – stood side-by-side for all to see. If anyone present had suspicions that the medium was somehow masquerading as any one of these three figures, the possibility was quickly dispelled when the curtain was lifted to reveal the entranced medium still inside the curtained-off area in which he had taken a seat at the very beginning.

The experience had an enormous impact on Eric and Heather “to the point of bewilderment”.  He adds: “For me, these remarkable revelations not only equalled but surpassed those long ago recorded events of biblical times” – a reference to intriguing biblical passages that also seem to record the physical return of various dead people, such as Moses and Elijah, and most of all Jesus who appeared to his disciples, apparently in physical form, after his crucifixion.

It is just one of many outstanding proofs of survival of death which Eric shares with us, woven into the fabric of his life story which also embraces his business enterprise and his work for Spiritualism at a national as well as a local level: having served as vice-president and then president of the Spiritualists’ National Union (SNU), he is now its honorary president.

Among the anecdotes he shares with us is the story behind his resignation as the SNU president after four years in that office. He tells us enough to make us aware how difficult it could be to preside over often heated National Executive Committee meetings, and one particular occasion that proved to be the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back. But ever the gentleman, Hatton doesn’t take sides or put blame on one person in particular.

Roy Stemman, Eric Hatton and Susan FarrowIn my foreword to the book (I am pictured, left, with Eric and his editorial collaborator Susan Farrow), I make the point that some of the mediumistic events Eric shares with us are so extraordinary “that many readers may doubt his testimony, and even his sanity. But not those who know him.”

Eric is, I add, “careful, cautious and considered [and] would be the perfect witness in a court of law”.

I have no doubt that reading this book could change the lives of some of its readers, just as the experiences described changed and inspired a life of dedicated service by its author.

Eric Hatton is, without a doubt, a remarkable man who not only preaches Spiritualism but lives it.

Photo credit: Danny Lee

Lilian Bailey and a royal seance

Lilian BaileyI promised in my last Blog, which was about the impressive evidence Lionel Logue received from psychic  Lilian Bailey, to share more information about the famous London medium’s royal connections. Logue, as I explained, was the speech therapist to the future King of England, George VI, and he also received messages from dead royals which he passed to the king.

I knew about that but nothing could have prepared me for the story which her son-in-law, Gordon Adams, bookshop manager and company secretary at Psychic Press, publishers of Psychic News, confided in me after my own sitting with Lilian. Bill (as Gordon was known to his friends) revealed that a remarkable séance had taken place in 1953, not many years before I began investigating Spiritualism. It was very much a family “secret” because Lillian was sworn to secrecy and I was told about it on the understanding that I did not discuss it with anyone until her death, which occurred in October 1971.

Bill Adams, I should explain, was a very good friend. We were colleagues for eight years and we were also near neighbours, Bill having tipped me off when a resident in the apartment building in London where he lived passed away, meaning that my application to rent the deceased’s flat was the first received by the landlord, and I was successful.

Here’s the story he told me, taken from my book Spirit Communication (Piatkus, 2005 and 2010):


Lilian Bailey knew there were people who required her to perform under the strictest test conditions before they would be prepared to accept the evidence of their own eyes and ears, and she always did her best to satisfy those demands, within reason. So when she received a request from a stranger to give a séance at a house in Kensington, she agreed. A limousine took her to a well-appointed property, then she was taken on to another address and was required to put on a blindfold during the journey so that there were no visual clues about the person or people she would be meeting. Again, she agreed.

She was eventually led into a room, where she sensed others were gathered, and was asked to conduct the séance, still wearing the blindfold. This was not a great hindrance, since Lilian Bailey often worked in trance. Puzzled but philosophical about the lengths to which people went to test her mediumship, the medium eased herself into a chair and soon felt herself drifting off into a trance, allowing her main spirit helper, Bill Wootton, and others in the next world to take over her body and speak through her lips.

In what seemed to her like no time at all, she returned to normal consciousness and was told she could remove the blindfold. As her eyes grew accustomed to the light she surveyed the sitters.

Sitting in a circle on gilt chairs were the Queen Mother, the Queen, Prince Philip, Princess Margaret, Princess Alexandra and the Duke of Kent.

This astonishing experience, which happened a year after the death of King George VI, had clearly been arranged in the hope of receiving a communication from the dead monarch, and it was almost certainly successful. But, since she was in trance, Lilian Bailey knew nothing of the conversations that took place between members of the British royal family and those who wished to speak to them from the spirit world. Nor have any of those who participated – unsurprisingly – ever commented directly on the secret séance.

Royal biographer and Daily Telegraph court correspondent Ann Morrow included the story in her book, The Queen Mother, published by Granada in 1984. She had asked Gordon Adams if Lilian Bailey was unnerved when she removed her blindfold. He replied: “My mother-in-law had dealings with all sorts of people, such as the Chinese leader Chiang Kai-shek and the King of Greece. So she did not feel intimidated by royalty; it was all in a day’s work for her.”

The Queen Mother is reported to have continued to phone Lilian Bailey for some time after the séance and further private sittings took place. Eventually, when she came to terms with her loss and was clearly satisfied that the dead King continued to watch over her from the spirit world, she asked the medium to Clarence House one last time. Removing a piece of costume jewellery from the dress she was wearing, the Queen Mother pinned it on Lilian Bailey’s shoulder, saying: “You know we do not have many possessions, but I would like you to have this.” It expressed her gratitude for the comfort she received. Almost immediately, the monarch’s widow returned to public life.

Since the Royal Family have never confirmed the story, can we be sure that this remarkable event actually took place?

Those who knew Lilian Bailey – who was awarded an OBE for services in France during World War I when she served with the Queen Mary’s Army Auxiliary Corps – are adamant that she would not have invented such a story to boost her reputation. She was already famous and, since the story was never published during her lifetime, it did not affect her standing among Spiritualists or the public. That may not satisfy sceptics.

More to the point is an observation made by Ann Morrow. In writing her book, she received assistance from the Queen Mother and her Private Secretary, Sir Martin Gilliat. They saw proofs of the book and raised no objection to the inclusion of the report on the royal séance. The story was repeated, again without objection, in Ann Morrow’s Without Equal: Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, published in July 2000 to mark her centenary.


Since I wrote Spirit Communication I’ve been made aware of a couple of additional facts which may or may not be relevant. The first is that, as well as telling the story in her biographies of The Queen Mother, Ann Morrow also includes “Mrs Lilian Bailey: a psychic who helped the Queen Mother after the King’s death” as one of just 19 individuals under the headline “Key Figures in the Life of the Queen Mother” at the front of Without Equal. Lilian sits in the alphabetical list above Stanley Baldwin who was British Prime Minister at the time of King Edward VIII’s abdication.

King George VI, Queen Elizabeth and Mackenzie KingI must add that Buckingham Palace poured cold water on the story, after a newspaper picked it up, with a spokesperson commenting that it was a nice after-dinner story but totally untrue. My response is that, having known the medium concerned and her son-in-law I have no reason to disbelieve the story. Besides, I also know that  The Queen Mother consulted society clairvoyant Tom Corbett, but that was also denied by the royal household.

Interestingly, King George VI and the Queen visited Canada and the United States three years after he became monarch. He was, of course, also King of Canada and the royal couple were accompanied throughout the trip by the Prime Minister of Canada, William Lyon Mackenzie King, who was then serving his third term in that office (from 1935-1948). He is pictured (left) at Banff Springs with the royal visitors.

Mackenzie King was a Spiritualist who not only consulted many mediums but also conducted his own mediumistic experiments. After a trip to the League of Nations in 1936, it is reported that he went to England to visit the London Spiritualist Alliance in London as part of his quest for greater spiritual understanding.

Throughout the 1940s Mackenzie King continued to consult mediums, including Lilian Bailey, Hester Dowden, Gladys Osborne Leonard, Mrs Sharplin and Geraldine Cummins.

So it is possible that Spiritualism was a topic of conversation between the royal visitors and Canada’s prime minister. If so, he would have had a receptive audience. After all, some years later King George VI told his speech therapist, “My family are no strangers to Spiritualism.”

King’s speech therapist sat with famous medium

Kings Speech posterI don’t need to be psychic to predict that a new book, The King’s Speech, is going to be a best-seller this Christmas, and a movie with the same title, to be released in the UK in early January, is destined to be a box office blockbuster. The film focuses on the fascinating story of how King George VI, father of Queen Elizabeth II, overcame a serious stammer with the help of a remarkable Australian speech therapist, Lionel Logue, and the friendship that developed between them. The book, written by the therapist’s grandson Mark Logue and Peter Conradi, is a far more extensive biography. But it doesn’t do justice to the spirit messages Lionel received through Lilian Bailey after his wife, Myrtle, died.

King's Speech book The authors acknowledge Logue’s interest in Spiritualism with these dismissive words:

Lionel Logue“Although otherwise a rational man, he became attracted to Spiritualism in the hope of making contact with her on the ‘other side’. As a result, he got in touch with Lilian Bailey, a ‘deep trance medium’. Over the years, Bailey had been consulted by a number of prominent figures and abroad – among them the Hollywood actresses Mary Pickford, Merle Oberon and Mae West, and Mackenzie King, the Canadian prime minister.”

The implication, of course, is that only irrational people investigate the possibility of spirit communication through mediums. The authors’ dismissal leaves the reader with the impression that Logue’s grief turned him into a credulous individual, which suggests they are not only unaware of the many scientists and eminent people who have sat with mediums and received impresssive evidence of an after-life, but also are ignorant of the content of the messages he received. They also write: “Quite how Logue [right] got in touch with Bailey and how many séances he attended is unclear; his sons, however, were appalled when he used to tell them he was going off to ‘get in touch’ with his late wife.”

Well, I can explain how he got to know Bailey. It came about soon after her death in 1945 when Logue sought help from Hannen Swaffer, Britain’s most famous journalist and newspaper columnist at that time, who was also a Spiritualist.

Hannen SwafferAccording to William F. Neech in his biography of Lilian Bailey, Death Is Her Life, Logue told Swaffer (left) in 1946, “I am a broken man. I have lost my wife and I cannot go on.” He also revealed that he was so grief-stricken that he had even contemplated suicide. The journalist promised to help if he could. A few days later Swaffer, who was often referred to as “the Pope of Fleet Street”, met with Lilian Bailey at a Spiritualist circle and asked, “Can you come to my flat to help a man in grave trouble?”

The medium said she would and Swaffer added: “I won’t tell you anything about him.” Lilian preferred it that way: the less she knew about a person the more impressive was the evidence she provided.

On arrival at Swaffer’s Trafalgar Square apartment no name was mentioned in the introductions. But immediately Lilian felt embarrassed, saying: “I don’t know why it is and I scarcely like to tell you, but George V is here. He asks me to thank you for what you did for his son.”

Subsequently, Logue’s dead wife communicated, controlling the entranced Lilian Bailey’s body and wrapping her arms around her husband. She talked to him about changes he had made to the house and garden – things about which no one else knew. The medium’s spirit guide, Bill Wootton, even told Logue that his pet name for his wife was “Muggsy”. Then he invited the speech therapist to ask any question.

Lilian Bailey“Does my wife want to say anything about the place where we first met?” he asked.

Bill Wootton responded with a puzzled expression. “She is referring to a bird named Charlie. It is not a canary. It looks like a sparrow.”

Logue was overwhelmed. Charlie Sparrow was his best friend and it was at his 21st birthday party that he and his future wife met and fell in love.

From then on, according to Neech’s biography, Logue had regular séances with Lilian Bailey (right) and on many occasions he spoke to King George VI about them, without meeting any hostility. “My family are no strangers to Spiritualism,” he told Logue.

King George VI expressed his gratitude to Logue by giving him a beautifully carved chair – the one in which he sat during his speech therapy sessions – and Logue, in turn, passed it on to Lilian Bailey. She used it for all the sittings given in her own home.

It could be that the authors of The King’s Speech were unaware of the Lilian Bailey biography. I suspect they were also unaware of how Logue met his bride-to-be, which proved so evidential. The first mention of Myrtle in their book comes in a reference to their marriage in Perth in 1907 which simply says they had met the previous year.

Geoffrey Rush plays Lionel LogueIn his introduction to the book, Mark Logue tells of the discovery of boxes of correspondence and scrapbooks in July 2010, when the book was close to completion. It would be fascinating to learn if they provide any further information about his sessions with Lilian Bailey.

King George VI sent a letter of condolence to his friend on learning of Myrtle’s death. In 1952 the King also died. It was Logue’s turn to express sympathy to his widow, who replied just two days later with a letter that shows Logue’s influence on the King went far beyond speech therapy.

“I think that I know perhaps better than anyone just how much you helped the King, not only with his speech, but, through that, his whole life, and outlook on life,” wrote the monarch’s widow, who would soon become The Queen Mother. “I shall always be deeply grateful to you for all you did for him.”

A little over a year later, Lionel Logue (depicted in the film by Geoffrey Rush, above) also passed away.

I knew Lilian Bailey well and had one sitting with her, towards the end of her life, though it was not strikingly evidential. I visited her in her home ­ – she was then living in Wembley, north London – where she sat in an impressive carved wooden chair to conduct the sitting.  That chair had been given to her by Lionel Logue, as a gift, in gratitude for the evidence he had received through her. It was the chair in which King George VI sat during his speech therapy sessions, which began in October 1926 when he was still Albert, Duke of York – before the abdication of his elder brother King Edward VIII and his own accession to the throne.

Despite my criticism, I can recommend The King’s Speech as a thoroughly entertaining read and I’m also looking forward to seeing the movie as soon as it’s released.

In my next blog, I’ll reveal more about Lilian Bailey and her royal connections.